+ Še*$^RIt^RIt^RIHt^RIHt^RIHt^RIH t ^RI H t ^RI H t 0RmtRtR RltR tR tR tR tR tRtR!RltRtRtRtRtR Rlt]!]4tRtRtRt Rt!Rt"]"!R4t#]"!R4t$]"!RR4t%R#)"N) literal_eval)cleandocWeakKeyDictionary)tree) parser_cache) split_linesc.pVPpVR8XdLVP4pVRJd4VPPR8wdVR8wdVPV4V#VR8Xd;VPV4VPFpV\ VRR7, pK V#VR8XdGVPR ,R 8Xd-VPR ,pVR 8wdV\ V4, pV#VPpVP\ 9dV'gVPV4VFpV\ WQ4, pK V# \dT#i;i) z For static analysis. nameFparam= expr_stmtT) last_added decorator)()type get_next_leafparentappendchildrenget_executable_nodes_EXECUTE_NODESAttributeError)noderresulttyp next_leafchildrs&& 3/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jedi/parser_utils.pyrrsHF ))C f}&&(  4;;#3#3w#>9PSCS MM$ 2 M1   d]]E *5TB BF#( M%  ==  #==$Ds{.t44 M B}}HyyN*: d#!.uAA" M   M s0 E EEc#"VxVPR,pVPR8XdVP^,xM)VPR8XdVxMVPR8XgR#VPR,pKf5i)comp_for sync_comp_forcomp_ifNrr)r%lasts& r"get_sync_comp_forsr+:sf N   R D  99 "--" " YY/ )Ji' }}R sA>BcBVP^,PR8H#)z Returns True if only one name is returned: ``for x in y``. Returns False if the for loop is more complicated: ``for x, z in y``. :returns: bool r r))for_stmts&r"for_stmt_defines_one_namer.Gs    Q  $ $ ..c$VPpVPTu;8dVP8:gM\R4hRp\VP4F8wrEW%P8dVu#VP 4pV\ 9gK6TpK: R#)z!The node is not part of the flow.N) start_posend_pos ValueError enumeraterget_first_leaf_FLOW_KEYWORDS) flow_noderr1keywordir! first_leafs&& r"get_flow_branch_keywordr;Qs{I   ) @y/@/@ @<==Gi001  &N))+  ' G 2 r/cjVP4pVe\\VP44#R#)z2Returns a cleaned version of the docstring token. ) get_doc_nodersafe_literal_evalvalue) scope_noders& r"clean_scope_docstringrB`s0  " " $D  )$**566 r/cVPR8XdtVPpVP4pVeTVPR8XdCVP^,pVPR8Xd\ \ VP 44#R#)r simple_stmtstringr=)rrget_next_siblingrrr?r@) tree_node maybe_strings& r"find_statement_documentationrIlss~~$$$  113  #  M1+44Q7 $$0#$5l6H6H$IJJ r/ctVR,P4pV^,R8XgVR9dR#\V4#):NNfr=)frrf)lowerr)r@ first_twos& r"r?r?xs5b !I|si<7  r/cVf+VPR8XdRpMVPPpVP4pV'd VR,pRRP RV44P 4,R,p\ P!RR V4pVP'd+V'g#R VPP4,pMRpW&,V,pR P \P!W44#) z Generate a string signature of a function. :param width: Fold lines if a line is longer than this value. :type width: int :arg func_name: Override function name when given. :type func_name: str :rtype: str lambdefzr$NNrr=c3@"TFqP4xK R#5iN)get_code).0r s& r" get_signature..s;F5nn&&Fsrz\s+ z -> ) rr r@ get_paramsjoinstripresub annotationrVtextwrapwrap) funcdefwidth call_stringomit_first_paramomit_return_annotationparamsprtypecodes &&&&& r" get_signaturerms <<9 $$K!,,,,K    !F bgg;F;;AACCcIA vsAA"8**3355 ?U "D 99X]]4/ 00r/cVPpVFp\W14K R# \dT;PT, unR#i;i)z Move the `Node` start_pos. N)rmoverline)r line_offsetrcs&& r"rorosE!==A   ! [ !s $$A  A cVPR8Xd-VP^,P4PpMVPR8Xd-VP^,P4PpMtVPR8Xd;VP^,P4P 4PpM)VP 4P 4PpRV9dR#WPR4RpRV9dVRVPR4pRV9dVRVPR4pV# \ dR#\dR#i;i)z` returns (as string) any comment that appears on the same line, after the node, including the # r- with_stmtrdN# r[) rrr5prefixr get_last_leafrr3index)r whitespacecomments& r"get_following_comment_same_liner|s+  99 "q)88:AAJ YY+ %q)88:AAJ YY) #q)88:HHJQQJ++-;;=DDJ *))#./0G w.7==./ w.7==./ N  s/.wrappersz  #, , 6/0J # #  635 5J/0 6  (,T(A AF%M s !966AAFr)rrrsf @r"_get_parent_scope_cachers  E   Nr/cZaSPpVfR#\V4'dVPR 9dVPP R4pVPV,P SP 8dSPPR8XdSPP S8XdV#SPPR8Xd&SPP^,S8XdV#VPpKV#V'd\V\P4'dpVPR8Xd]\;QJd-V3RlVP44F 'gK RM" RM!V3RlVP444'gV#VPpEK) z Returns the underlying scope. NT:r tfpdefif_stmtc3<"TF9pVPSPu;8*;'dVP8MuxK; R#5irU)r1r2)rWnrs& r"rX#get_parent_scope..s4=%;KK4>>EEAIIEE%;s &AAF)rrdrR) rrrrryr1r isinstancerFlowanyget_test_nodes)rrscoperysf& r"get_parent_scopersC KKE }  E??zz??,,S1>>%(22dnnD{{''72t{{7G7G47O L ))X5$++:N:Nq:QUY:YL!&  L z%;;JJ)+=%*%9%9%;==%*%9%9%;===  r/c,\W4P#)z Basically access the cached code lines in parso. This is not the nicest way to do this, but we avoid splitting all the lines again. )get_parso_cache_nodelinesgrammarpaths&&r"get_cached_code_linesrs  . 4 44r/c>\VP,V,#)z This is of course not public. But as long as I control parso, this shouldn't be a problem. ~ Dave The reason for this is mostly caching. This is obviously also a sign of a broken caching architecture. )r_hashedrs&&r"rrs  ( ..r/c.\VPRR7RV^,VP, ^,pV^,pVPV^,8XdW0P,pV'gR#VR,RVVR&RP V4#)z+ Cuts of the value of the leaf at position T)keependsNr=r()r r@rpcolumnr])leafpositionrrs&& r"cut_value_at_positionr"s{  T 23OHQK$))4Ka4O PE a[F yyHQK++ b '6"E"I 775>r/cVPR8XdQ\VP4^8Xd5VP^,R8Xd\VP^,4#R#VPR8XdyVPpV^,R8XdR#\V^,4'gR#\;QJd#RVR,4F 'dK R# R#!RVR,44#VPR 8H#) zH Checks if a path looks like `name` or `name.foo.bar` and not `name()`. atomrF atom_exprawaitc3L"TFqP^,R8HxK R#5i)r.N)r)rWrrs& r"rX!expr_is_dotted..?s>A::a=C's"$rSTr )rlenrexpr_is_dottedall)rrs& r"rr0s yyF t}}  "t}}Q'73'>!$--"23 3 yyK== A;' !hqk**s>">ss>s>s>">>> 99 r/caV3RlpV#)c<VP4F.pVP^,pVP4S9gK-R# R#)z This is a heuristic. It will not hold ALL the times, but it will be correct pretty much for anyone that doesn't try to beat it. staticmethod/classmethod are builtins and unless overwritten, this will be correct. TF)get_decoratorsrrV) function_noder dotted_name method_namess& r"r&_function_is_x_method..wrapperDsA'557I#,,Q/K##%58r/)rrsj r"_function_is_x_methodrCs  Nr/ staticmethod classmethodpropertycached_property>rexprtermtestpowerfactorrdor_testand_exprand_testrnot_testxor_exprr arith_expr comparison shift_expr import_from import_name) tryexceptfinallyelseifelifwithforwhiler)HNFF)&r_rbastrinspectrweakrefr parso.pythonr parso.cacherparsor rr6rr+r.r;rBrIr?rmror|rrrget_cached_parent_scoperrrrrfunction_is_staticmethodfunction_is_classmethodfunction_is_propertyrr/r"rs %$B  "J !/   1B !>R(@22BC5/ &  1@/ >,Z9JKr/